Jan 20, 2011 Comments Off on Underlying Slur in Morrison’s Hunger Strike Comments
Underlying Slur in Morrison’s Hunger Strike Comments
Underlying Slur in Morrison’s Hunger Strike Comments
Irish News letters page
Terry Hughes
I read with interest Danny Morrison’s recent article in the Andersonstown News about the 1980 hunger strike, which was led by my brother, the late Brendan Hughes.
“Whether the republican leadership’s analysis and depiction of what was happening, was correct”, I do agree that the leadership was bereft of ideas on how to resolve the prison crisis.
Not only was there a dearth of ideas on how to bring the prison protest to a successful conclusion, but there was abject failure at leadership level to highlight to the outside world the conditions that the prisoners were enduring, and it was only when the first hunger strike was called that the world would see what was happening to the Blanketmen in the H Blocks.
During this time there were many rallies and meetings to highlight the demands of the prisoners. On December 8th, 1980 — the eve of Charles Haughey’s summit meeting with Margaret Thatcher — I met with the then Taoiseach in a hotel in Kilkenny to impress upon him the urgency of trying to resolve the hunger strike. While Mr Haughey told me that he was not pessimistic of the outcome, he certainly did not leave me with the feeling that he would stick his neck out to resolve it.
The hunger strike ended on December 18th, and, as Danny Morrison now admits, there was nothing on the table when Brendan called off the hunger strike after 52 days.
Danny used the word ‘unilaterally’ to describe Brendan’s decision to end the hunger strike, saying that he did not consult his OC, Bobby Sands.
There is an underlying slur there, whether or not Danny Morrison wishes to admit it.
What Mr Morrison did not say – and should have said — was that Brendan had little choice other than to intervene to save Sean McKenna’s life.
I say this because Sean had indicated to Brendan early on in the hunger strike that he was not prepared to die, and had secured Brendan’s word of honour that he would not let him die.
As well as that, several other hunger strikers had informed my brother that they were not prepared to die either.
So what was Brendan to do in those circumstances? Let Sean die? Brendan believed that that would be tantamount to him committing murder.
Perhaps Danny Morrison thinks Brendan should not have kept his word to Sean and let him die. If he does think this, he should say so.
Brendan lived to see ten of his best friends and comrades die on the second hunger strike.
It affected him deeply and, I believe, was the primary contributing factor to his own early death.
Abandoned and demonised by his erstwhile comrades in the leadership, Brendan Hughes he died as he lived, a republican, and a man of honour.
First published in the Irish News